{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "receipt_id": "par_public_writing_v0_4_2026_09_20",
  "supersedes": "par_public_writing_v0_3_2026_09_17",
  "need": "Make the first public screen communicate a useful problem-specific reuse decision before asking the reader to understand prior-art terminology or evidence machinery.",
  "artifact_role": "public_value_and_decision_presentation",
  "discovery": {
    "queries": [
      "rendered production homepage at commit 0c85038f4fc8a2104fc4ffbb26a6ee9929521dd2",
      "existing public problem-by-repository decision_state values",
      "current generated brief and decision-card templates",
      "current product and information-budget contracts"
    ],
    "stop_condition": "The authoritative assessments already contained problem-specific actions and reconsideration triggers, so the smallest complete correction was to expose those fields directly and keep the evidence model unchanged."
  },
  "contenders": [
    {
      "name": "Copy-only homepage rewrite",
      "disposition": "reject",
      "evidence": [
        "could make the promise clearer but would still hide the actual use, watch, reject, and build decisions",
        "would leave decision cards as repository counts rather than useful answers"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Surface existing contextual decisions and residual work",
      "disposition": "adopt",
      "evidence": [
        "every assessed candidate already has a problem-specific decision_state",
        "every assessment already records contribution, caution, evidence, and reconsideration triggers",
        "every brief already records covered and unresolved scope",
        "requires no new runtime authority or factual source"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Restore repository-first catalog pages",
      "disposition": "reject",
      "evidence": [
        "a repository page cannot own contextual fit",
        "hundreds of rich pages would again make the evidence corpus look like the product"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Add general natural-language discovery",
      "disposition": "defer",
      "evidence": [
        "would require a new retrieval and trust boundary",
        "is explicitly outside the current deterministic implementation cycle"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "hard_gates": [
    "every public action is derived from an explicit problem-by-repository assessment",
    "actions remain scoped to the named problem and never become universal rankings",
    "screened metadata cannot create a public action or rich evidence page",
    "the complete canonical evidence remains available beneath the smaller human view",
    "the homepage states the current discovery limitation instead of implying a prompt-driven service",
    "no model, hosted service, new dependency, or runtime authority is introduced"
  ],
  "unknowns": [
    "The five current decisions are a deliberately small dogfood set rather than broad market coverage.",
    "Rendered first-look review can establish clarity defects but does not measure sustained reader usefulness.",
    "Broader reader testing may show that some action labels or example problems need further refinement."
  ],
  "decision_effect": "Lead the homepage with reuse, skip, and build outcomes; use a familiar quality-gate decision as the worked example; show contextual action labels and reconsideration triggers on every brief; and make decision cards summarize both the recommended path and the custom scope that remains.",
  "reconsider_when": [
    "A first-time reader still cannot state what decision the product changes after viewing the first screen",
    "A public action cannot be traced to an explicit assessment",
    "The public decision set grows enough to require a new need-first navigation layer",
    "General discovery receives a separately reviewed deterministic retrieval contract"
  ],
  "observed_at": "2026-09-20T08:50:59Z"
}